Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 90-94, 2024.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1005220

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE To investigate the preferences of patients who underwent solid organ transplantation regarding therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and explore the factors influencing patients’ decision-making process, so as to provide support for the development of individualized medication guidelines for MPA and improvement of clinical decision-making. METHODS The cross-sectional study was used to design the questionnaire on the patients’ preferences to accept MPA TDM, and involved patients who underwent solid organ transplantation and received MPA treatment at two tertiary hospitals in Beijing from April 14, 2022, to June 27, 2022. The Likert 5-level scoring method was used to score the patients’ preferences to accept MPA TDM, the influencing factors and their correlation of the patients’ preferences to accept MPA TDM were analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis and binary Logistic regression analysis, and the nonparametric test and chi-square test were used to rank and analyze the consistency of the factors affecting patients’ preference decision. RESULTS A total of 140 questionnaires were collected, and the effective recovery rate was 77.35%. The average preference score of 140 patients to receive MPA TDM was (4.01±0.65), and the overall preference value was high. There were 116 (82.86%) patients agreed or strongly agreed with MPA TDM. Significant differences were observed in preference scores between patients who had previously undergone MPA TDM and those who had never undergone it ([ 4.30±0.53) scores vs. (3.80±0.65) scores, P<0.001]. Additionally, patients’ preference scores were significantly influenced by their understanding level and attention level (P<0.001). The ranking of factors contributing to decision-making exhibited consistency (P<0.001). The factors were ranked in descending order of clinical efficacy, safety, comfortability, economy and time cost. CONCLUSIONS The patients who underwent solid organ transplantation hold high preferences towards MPA TDM. The primary factors influencing their decisions are their prior experience, understanding level, and attention level.

2.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 2018-2021, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-980599

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE To provide a reference for establishing an automatic checking mode and improving the checking efficiency of the unit dose dispensing system of oral drugs in hospital. METHODS The automatic checking process reengineering team was established in our hospital. ECRSI method was adopted to sort out the verification process and mode of drug bags for the unit dose formula of our hospital through five principles of eliminating, combining, rearranging, simplifying and increasing, and the hardware series problem and the problem of excessive system false-positive proportion were optimized. The drug bags for the unit dose formula were randomly selected from 10 wards, the efficiency and external error rates of manual check and automatic checking mode before and after optimization were compared, and the false-positive reporting failure in automatic checking mode was also compared before and after optimization. RESULTS After the establishment of the automatic checking mode of the unit dose formula for oral drugs, the average checking time of drug bags was significantly shorter than that of manual checking mode in the other 8 wards except for cardiovascular and renal departments (P<0.05). After the optimization of the automatic checking mode, the average checking time of drug bags in all wards was significantly shorter than that in manual checking mode (P<0.05). Compared with before optimization of the automatic checking mode, the average checking time of drug bags was shortened by 0.43 s, and the average checking time of drug bags in half of the wards was shortened significantly (P<0.05). At the same time, the false-positive proportion decreased from 96.83% before optimization to 92.76% after optimization (P<0.05). The external error rate dropped from 0.039‰ in manual checking mode to 0.019‰ before optimization and 0.015‰ after optimization (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Based on ECRSI method, the automatic checking mode for the unit dose dispensing system of oral drugs can effectively reduce the average checking time of drug bags, reduce external error and improve the work efficiency of pharmacists.

3.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 740-744, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-923012

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE To analyze the adverse drug reaction (ADR)signals of ado-trastuzumab emtansine and brentuximab vedotin,so as to provide reference for clinical medication safety. METHODS Using the FDA adverse drug event reporting system (FAERS)database and OpenVigil 2.1 data platform ,the ADR of the two drugs were collected from being approved by FDA to the Sep. 30th,2021. The ADR signals were detected by frequency method and sorted according to the occurrence frequency and signal strength respectively. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS A total of 2 319 and 3 178 ADR reports related to ado-trastuzumab emtansine and brentuximab vedotin were collected ,215 and 329 ADR signals were detected respectively. According to the occurrence frequency,the most frequent ADR s of the two drugs were thrombocytopenia (109 cases)and febrile neutropenia (198 cases), separately,which were consistent with the drug instructions. According to the signal strength ,the spider nevus of ado-trastuzumab emtansine(report odds ratio of 451.46)and the noninfectious endocarditis of brentuximab vedotin (report odds ratio of 304.35) ranked first ,both of which were not reported in the drug instructions. It is suggested that attention should be paid not only to the most common ADR s of blood and lymphatic system caused by both drugs ,but also to the ADRs not reported in the drug instructions such as spider nevus of ado-trastuzumab emtansine and noninfective endocarditis of brentuximab vedotin.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL